4/30/2023 0 Comments Js sass livereload es6The Sass team is exploring its options for future performance improvements, but for now, you will get the best performance from sass.sync(). Unfortunately, Node fibers are discontinued and will not work in Node.js 16. We used to recommend Node fibers as a way to speed up asynchronous rendering with Dart Sass. + import gulpSass from 'gulp-sass' + const sass = gulpSass(dartSass) What about fibers? import sass from 'gulp-sass' - piler = dartSass To render your CSS with a build task, then watch your files for changes, you might write something like this: If performance is critical, you can use node-sass instead, but bear in mind that node-sass may not support modern Sass features you rely on. The Sass team is exploring ways to improve asynchronous rendering with Dart Sass, but for now, you will get the best performance from sass.sync(). ⚠️ Note: When using Dart Sass, synchronous rendering is twice as fast as asynchronous rendering. We'll show some examples of how to do that. Then, export your task with the export keyword. Your task can call sass() (to asynchronously render your CSS), or sass.sync() (to synchronously render your CSS). For examples that work with Gulp 3, check the docs for an earlier version of gulp-sass. Note: These examples are written for CommonJS modules and assume you're using Gulp 4. Gulp.Import dartSass from 'sass' import gulpSass from 'gulp-sass' const sass = gulpSass ( dartSass ) Usage './node_modules/popper.js/dist/umd/popper.js', including Popper.js fixes Bootstrap issues includes( env) Ĭonst destination = production ? 'public' : 'static' This should give you an idea of what node packages you’ll need to install.Ĭonst include = require( 'gulp-include') Ĭonst sourcemaps = require( 'gulp-sourcemaps') Ĭonst production =. Feel free to disagree, if you really want feel free to submit a PR with a webpack implementation. So I’m going to recommend you just install Gulp to watch your assets and build them when you deploy. I couldn’t imagine a worse way to spend my weekend than wrapping my head around Webpack again for such a simple project though. There are definitely other ways to manage your assets, Webpackīeing the most ‘advanced’ of them. I really don’t think this is necessary and it will only serve to confuse other people used to Hugo as well any content management frontends like Forestry.io There are quite a few example projects out there that move the Hugo files into something like a site folder. I am only building JavaScript and StyleSheets for this project, if you wanted to add fonts etc you could probably figure out the pattern from there. In order to prep for this I have spent some time working on this site which you can view the source code for on Github To help those who are looking to give it a go I thought I’d put together a how-to for what I would consider to be good practice for building a site in Hugo that supports ES6 and SASS. I hope others decide to take Hugo on as their static site generator, I think the community would benefit from having additional developers Which seems like pretty solid validation for the project. Recently the Bootstrap team announced they’d be replacing Jekyll with Hugo for their docs I’ve been using Hugo across a few different projects for almost 2 years now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |